Bubblemaps Score

The Bubblemaps Score provides a simple way to assess how decentralized a token’s supply is. It analyzes the distribution of tokens among top holders and the connections between them, turning this information into a score from 0 to 100

• From 0 (less decentralized) to 100 (more decentralized)

• Analyzes the top 250 holders, excluding CEXs, DEXs, contracts…

• The more clusters you have and the bigger they are, the lower your score.

• The more difference you have between your top holders, the lower it is going.

• The score only considers holders and clusters detected by Bubblemaps. Anything we don’t detect won’t affect the score

🔴 Score: <1

Score 0: Those tokens have every holder connected, forming a single cluster holding 100% of the supply, resulting in a score close to 0

🔴 Score: 10-20

Score 11.8: Multiple large clusters control significant portions of the supply, resulting in a very low bubblemaps score.

Score 14.8: A single cluster controls 58.39% of the supply, creating extreme ownership concentration and resulting in a very low decentralization score.

🟠 Score: 20-30

A large cluster of 26 connected wallets holds 27.62% of the supply, heavily concentrating ownership and resulting in a score of 22.7

A cluster of 6 connected wallets controls 8.77% of the supply, while the remaining visible supply is held by only a few smaller holders, resulting in a score of 24.7.

🟠 Score: 30-50

Score 32.5: Despite several clusters, the largest controls 15.64% of the supply and ownership remains distributed across many other entities, resulting in a moderate decentralization score.

Score 34.5: A large cluster controls 8% of the supply, but the remaining supply is relatively distributed

🟠 Score: 50-70

The supply is relatively well distributed among top holders, with no dominant holder or cluster, resulting in a score of 50

The supply is relatively well distributed among top holders, but two clusters hold 5.23% and 4.04% of the supply, bringing the score down to 63

🟢 Score: 70-100

The supply is evenly distributed among top holders, with only one small cluster holding 1.62% of the supply, resulting in a high score of 85.4

The supply is very evenly distributed among top holders, with no dominant holder and only two small clusters, resulting in a very high score of 97